Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How long is too long for domain URL length?
-
I noticed one of the negatively correlated ranking factors was length of URL. I'm building a page from scratch, we are trying to rank for 'Minneapolis Fitness' and 'Minneapolis Massage'.
Is www.minnnepolismassageandfitness.com just ridiculously long? Or does the exact match outweigh the penalty for URL length?
-
Now its all starting to come together. I love involving the community in the decision. Will do!
-
So with minneapolis massage I'd get great benefit for the keyword "minneapolis massage". But for every other keyword, the infinity of long-tails, I'm at a disadvantage for
EXACTLY! This reasoning is why I strongly recommend a short, branded domain name as the primary URL. My preference is to compete with great content and SEO strategies rather then trying to purchase an assortment of keyword domain names. That tactic is primarily for those who lack the proper SEO knowledge, or who have deep pockets to create a solid web page for each domain name and properly redirect it to the main site.
If you found a very high traffic perfect match phrase, you could consider acquiring the domain name and trying a couple things, but overall your best bet is a solid primary domain.
You have the disadvantage of a long city name (Minneapolis) along with other variations (Twin Cities) used. I would suggest focusing more on the "Fitness" aspect and allowing your physical location and other factors to establish relevancy for the location. "WalkerFitness", "SunshineFitness" or whatever brand seems to fit you best.
When trying to brainstorm names, engage your current clients. Make a poll, take a survey, give out a prize to whomever picks the best name! The process can generate publicity for you "Free 1 hour massage + 1 month fitness membership".
-
Definitely more clear for the noob! Thanks for the reply. Most helpful!
It occured to me as I've been thinking about this that the longer URL correlates negatively with every single keyword you target, while the exact match gives you a benefit only to the exact match keyword.
So with minneapolis massage I'd get great benefit for the keyword "minneapolis massage". But for every other keyword, the infinity of long-tails, I'm at a disadvantage for:
Minneapolis Fitness
St. Paul Fitness
Twin Cities fitness
in-home personal trainer in south minneapolis
etc. etc.
These long tails have got to out-traffic the simple "minneapolis massage" in the long term. So now I'm thinking we need something short and branded. "Minneapolis Massage" is still a possibility but it is a bit long to type and rather boring.
-
Hi Jesse,
Basically, the only significant search volume is for the shorter two word term "minneapolis massage", so there is no benefit in going for the longer term (which also has a negative correlation for rankings).
So, since Ryan advised that the .net version of minneapolismassage is available, if you are wanting an exact match domain that might be a better option.
Since the return you are wanting is quite modest, then the traffic afforded by that term and the little extra you might attract from other terms should work for you if you can get some reasonable rankings.
I would suggest that you put some good effort into local search optimization if you decide to go with that domain.
Hope that is clearer,
Sha
-
I'm afraid I'm getting a little lost. I'm still new to all this.
As far as I can tell the correlations are in conflict. +0.22 exact match. Domain name length -0.07. So it seems to me that the data says go for exact match even though it makes it long.
I'm going to guess at what a "breakout" term is. They must mean keywords like Minneapolis Fitness, Minneapolis Massage, etc.
I'm also going to guess that "single word head terms" mean fitness, massage, and Minneapolis. If so then it is true that we aren't interested in trying to compete for those.
The scope of the project is very small. Basically a personal trainer and a massage therapist who want to bring in a few extra clients. The site would be very small scale as well, basically a platform for them to interact with their client base, and bring in a new client or two from time to time.
I'm hoping that the level of traffic for "minneapolis massage" and "minneapolis fitness" or "minneapolis personal trainer" would bring enough traffic to accomplish the goal of bringing in 2 or 3 new regular clients per year for each of the professionals.
If this is a poor assumption someone please let me know so I can adjust our expectations.
-
First, the correlation data is something I would pay attention to.
Second, since the longtail exact match and the majority of the other breakout terms from that very long URL appear to bring little or no traffic to the table - why would you bother to go against the data? (OK, the single word head terms have what looks like great traffic, but going after those is not a "new site" proposition in my view).
-
yep, 3 n's is a mistake. So you think the exactmatch.com is overkill for these keywords? Might be better to go with something shorter and more branded?
-
Hi Jesse,
First, I'm going to assume that the three n's in the URL you posted was a mistake?
So, having made that assumption, I think the philosophical debate is largely a moot point.
Generally, the intent of developing an exact match domain is to rank for the term or terms that carry exact match traffic volume.
The image below pretty much tells the story I think.
If you haven't yet found it, the tool is the SEOmoz Keyword Difficulty Tool
-
Hi George, that's an interesting take on things. Can you give us any more background information on this or resources? Thanks!
-
I have to disagree with Ryan. 2 terms isn't max length URL can have. Always use as many characters in URL as it's necessary. There is no anything like "very long domain".
For example: minnnepolismassageandfitness.com will give you more domain SEO juice than minnnepolismassage.com
If you are concerned on search engine visits, use whole keyword in your domain. It will be easier to rank for keyword. But if you wish to receive direct visits (which I doubt), use user-friendly domains, keep it short and nice looking.
-
You want to stick to a maximum of 2 terms in your URL. Three is pushing it. Four words is too much.
Doing a google search for "minneapolis fitness" shows most of the top results do not have minneapolis nor fitness in the URL. You can freely try names such as "Sunshine Fitness" or whatever your business name is in an effort to brand the URL rather then attempt keyword matches.
If you really want a URL match then minneapolisfitness.net is available. While I strongly prefer a .com, I would prefer this particular .net over the URL you suggested.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Removing Zombie pages effect on domain authority?
Hi. Recently I got a project (removing zombie pages here: https://www.alamto.com/ ) As you can see this site has about 20k indexed page on google and it seems I should remove about 6000 useless indexed page. does removing (Noindex) these pages affect on the site metrics? Which metrics would affected? and how? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | jafarfahi1 -
URL keyword separator best practice
Hello. Wanted to reach out see what the consensus is re-keyword separators So just taken on a new client and all their urls are structured like /buybbqpacks rather than buy-bbq-packs - my understanding is that it comes down to readability, which influences click through, rather than search impact on the keyword. So we usually advise on a hyphen, but the guy's going to have to change ALLOT of pages & setup redirects to change it all wasn't sure if it was worth it? Thanks! Stu
On-Page Optimization | | bloomletsgrow0 -
Link flow for multiple links to same URL
Hi there,
On-Page Optimization | | doctecs
my question is as follows: How does Google handle link flow if two links in a given page point to the same URL? (do they flow link individually or not?) This seems to be a newbie question, but actually it seems that there is little evidence and even also little consensus in the SEO community about this detail. Answers should include source Information about the current state of art at Google is preferable The question is not about anchor text, general best practises for linking, "PageRank is dead" etc. We do know that the "historical" PageRank was implemented (a long time ago) without special handling for multiple links, as e.g. last stated by Matt Cutts in this video: http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-one-page-two-links-page-counted-first-link-192718 On the other hand, many people from the SEO community say that only the first link counts. But so far I could not find any data to back this up, which is quite surprising.0 -
Google is indexing urls with parameters despite canonical
Hello Moz, Google is indexing lots of urls despite the canonical in my site. Those urls are linked all over the site with parameters like ?, and looks like Google is indexing them despite de canonical. Is Google deciding to index those urls because they are linked all over the site? The canonical tag is well implemented.
On-Page Optimization | | Red_educativa0 -
Url structure with dash or slash
Hi There We have a content website. We don't rank well category image related searches but we get quite good traffic for those keywords. Those keywords are mostly like "category images". We want to change our url structure and we have 2 options now. 1- domain.com/category/category-images 2-domain.com/category/images option 1 repeats the category name so it looks spammy option 2 doesn't really have the keyword. any ideas which one tho choose? Thanks! ps: we don't want to use domain.com/category-images (too many root link)
On-Page Optimization | | muminaydin0 -
Post url not matching with post title ( wordpress)
I have this site called searchoflife.com on which I have noticed the post urls are not matching with the post title. For Example:Post Title - A Dialogue With NaturePost URL - http://searchoflife.com/dialogue-nature-2013-09-12 Words like 'A' and 'with' are not present in the post URL. This has been the trend since a few days. After investigating I found out that it was due to my plugin SEO ultimate which is actually creating post slugs automatically for the post urls. So my question is whether it is advisable to use post slugs instead of the full post url. Does it affect the SERPS for my site?
On-Page Optimization | | toxicpls0 -
URL length... is >115 now >255?
I've been having detailed discussions with a CMS provider on behalf of a client. Long URLs are the least of their problems however, the developer is arguing that Google has amended their algorithm and will now read URLs that are up to 255 characters long. I have stated that as far as I am aware, Google will still not read URLs over 115 characters... Before I stamp my feet, can someone confirm what is actually happening? SEOmoz still classes URLs >115 characters long as an amber issue. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Switch_Digital0 -
Www1 and www domain
hi, I have a client who has an e-commerce business. My client does not want to fill the pages with too much content and has set up a www1 version with the same domain-name as the www. The plan is to create a lot of content and push www1 in ranking and then sending users (via links) to the www for ordering. Although there will be no duplicate content published on www and www1 this seems like an odd strategy, especially since the www already has a good page rank, and I'm not sure about how engines view a www.domain.com and www1domain.com situation even with unique content in each. Any thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | vibelingo0